Another Warning

Well I just included the first to be fair :slight_smile: but tbh either or would be better.

I currently am lol

I understand why MA changed it to 10 to 1 with Umbranoid Crystal Emitter and Umbranoid Energy Frame because blueprints that used those could not be realistically crafted before because you can not trade those component.

Crafter if you need them you need to hunt mid to high level umbranoids, no point ordering them via crafting machine because nobody can sell them to you.

Those non-tradable componens are also used in new Karabin UM-60 and UM-155 bluerints.

1 Like

not a bad idea…

BUT

that authism concepts suck big time ^^

imagine wanting a fair world and more honest ppl puts you already in the authistic spectrum…

take the MBTI model plz …

maybe take a ENTJ-A (commander) + INFJ :stuck_out_tongue:

…

Now that is one of the most interesting thoughts in a long time. I’ll think about it in the real world for a bit, but I unfortunately think you are on to something there.
We are getting increased warnings from players about developments here, and all over the place, that also worry about AI and its suggestions.
I wonder if anyone can add to a new AI learning prompt in and of itself that the learning should focus heavily on coming from autistic sources. I wonder if that model would be fairer and more honest than taking a melting pot of input for the basic training?

This exists by and large in LLM/AI theory and it is useful. It is not necessarily ā€œautistic sourcesā€ but it is controlled reasoning modes.

Basically what you are exploring is ā€œhigh precision modeā€ where you reduce implicit inferences and go entirely (more or less) on data and/or rules

Reducing implicit inferences increases reliance on observed patterns and thus reduces robustness. (You could never prompt for something that had no affirmation in data) And with it reduces the usefulness to a large extent.

I think, in terms of altruism, it would probably outperform the ā€œrun of the millā€-AI.

2 Likes

https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/forum/index.php?threads/19-5-0-additional-patch-notes.310329/

1 Like

What if this topic hadn’t been created? What else had we simply overlooked? :frowning:
(These are rhetorical questions)

Good question but at least they did and I’m hoping they fixed mining also. I havnt been back at it yet to start my bitchen up again full throttle since I was hunting trying to get some skill juices past week. Glad they will refund you guys the lost ped for the difference.

A couple of hours ago, I received several instalments of peds directly into my inventory. Apparently, they were compensation for the conversion.
The quantities and amounts exactly match the converted boosted blueprints.
I’m just reporting it here for clarity.

2 Likes

Thanks for the info, but I think for proper clarity we’d like to know the ā€˜rate’ of compensation.
You say it was the boosteds that got converted, so to know they matched perfectly with your blueprints, I can only hope you mean a straight multiple conversion factor according to the number of clicks you had (that was not simply 1 pec)…

He means the boost was compensated.

Unfortunately Mindark is really hosing the future of the game.
I have had $10’s of k available to deposit for a couple years now, I keep getting reasons to continue on with withdrawls.

The first blueprint I actually put a few k ped on in a couple years is not clickable lol. (cooking station 109)

Not that I am complaining, the Cybertruck, The CNC machine, the condo income are amazing, but I really just wanted a way to fall back in love with this game.

I owned the largest blueprint collection in game for over a decade, still is probably…but I have zero reason to keep pushing with stuff like this.

Been a fun run, 10 million USD looted in my time here.

But this is enough for me.

9 Likes

It 100% is clickable, as people have already crafted it.

2 Likes

He just needs a 106 to click it but god forbid forgo try to learn something.

1 Like