Can MindArk clarify the current status of the Genesis Project and extinction timeline?

As of today, March 10, 2026, it has been 335 days since the announcement regarding the Genesis Project and the potential planetary extinction event within four years.

Since that announcement, there has been no official update or clarification about the status, timeline, or implementation details of this system.

This message has very real implications for the Entropia Universe economy. Players make decisions based on the information provided by MindArk—whether that means investing in items, purchasing deeds, developing on specific planets, or even deciding whether to continue playing.

When a statement suggests that entire planets could potentially cease to exist within a defined time-frame, it naturally creates uncertainty. Without follow-up communication, that uncertainty can affect player behavior in ways that are not healthy for the economy or the community—reduced investment, withdrawals, hesitation to engage with certain planets, or players simply stepping away from the game.

A few days ago during Socrates’ most recent stream, I politely asked whether there was any update regarding the Genesis Project and the extinction timeline. Unfortunately the question was not addressed.

I understand that development takes time and that plans can evolve, but even a brief status update would go a long way toward keeping the community informed and maintaining confidence in the platform.

Could MindArk please provide any update or clarification regarding:

[ul]
[li]The current status of the Genesis Project[/li][li]Whether the four-year extinction timeline is still in effect[/li][li]What players and planet partners should realistically expect moving forward[/li][/ul]

Transparency and communication are extremely important in a real-cash economy. Many players would simply appreciate knowing where things stand.

This highlights the broader issue that players are currently facing in the game. An announcement that raises the possibility of planetary extinction and the loss or replacement of items, followed by months without clarification or follow-up, creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and doubt within the Entropia economy. In a real-cash economy, messages of this magnitude inevitably influence how players approach investment, long-term goals, and where they choose to cycle. Without clear communication, speculation fills the gap, which is not healthy for player confidence or the stability of the universe’s economy.

This reflects another important point: many projects in Entropia require months or even years of grinding, investment, and planning. When players are committing that kind of time and money within a real-cash economy, clear communication becomes essential so people can make informed decisions about their long-term goals.

These sentiments continue to appear throughout the Entropia community, and it is clear that many players are seeking clarification regarding the original announcement and what it realistically means going forward. When uncertainty persists around issues that could affect entire planets, items, and long-term projects, it inevitably influences economic behavior within the universe. Players become hesitant to invest, cycle, or pursue long-term goals tied to specific planets. Some clarification regarding the current status of the Genesis Project and the extinction timeline would go a long way toward reducing speculation and helping restore confidence in the Entropia economy.

25 Likes

Damn Avalon, I was thinking of posting about this today!

There has been radio silence on the ‘Genesis Project’ since it was announced.

If it was BS and another crack-pipe dream (most likely), admit it and we will move on.

I and many others haven’t deposited more than pizza money since this announcement. Why would we?

4 Likes

Short answer: no

The way I see it is that Genesis Project is nothing less than the new game engine (Unreal Engine).

Every Planet Partner should be responsible for the conversion of their own planet assets from terrain, items, mobs, textures, missions, etc. With that post Mindark is just telling us that they will not convert any PP assets into Unreal Engine by them self as it should be written in their contracts. They maybe even were obliged by law to notice us the costumers.

Yes that post generated more fear than anything but we also must understand that those kind of tasks take a lot of time and resources to do. You won´t convert all the Arkadia assets into Unreal Engine over night. The man power and knowledge to do so is huge! But Mindark is also saying that in case that the PP wont join the “project” you will always get a equivalent item. Yeah it sucks to not know if your LA or apartment will continue to be on Arkadia or if you will get a new one on a Calypso corner instead. About the items (weapon, armor, cloths) I believe that they will always keep the same stats but the visual most probably will change.

5 Likes

are you familiar with compet ?

10 Likes

I am! Boy oh boy was it a great investment ???

2 Likes

yeah but that could have been an email to the PP, not public statement to players

You don’t think planet partners had more info than we did when we got the public statement?

2 Likes

Absolutely agreed that an update is needed, better yet regular updates. While this threatening statement we all remember seemed like pure clarity at the time, it was also so highly unprofessional and out of character in a business world that one has a hard time taking it seriously. It sounded like an emotional outburst of a dictator whose minions didn’t want to obey.

Since this is RCE, participants (deliberately not saying “players” here) make decisions based on their economic outlook, and therefore are less inclined to invest where the future is more uncertain. The longer this uncertainty is maintained, the closer we get to a point when it becomes a valid question whether MindArk thinks having independent companies running various parts of the game was a mistake and may be tempted to kill off any form of disagreement or competition this naturally created. Uncertainty fosters speculations like this. If you want them to go away, do something about it. Otherwise the crowd might conclude that either there is utter chaos and nobody knows what to do, or an actual destruction plan. Neither is good.

11 Likes

no, because some of them said they had no idea and got startled by the news. There are only 2 pps left anyway, hope they offboard as well anyway, so mindark can start developing the consistent game

2 Likes

Planet Partner concept was weak and fragile, poor design concept from the start. Planet Michael, LOL, right?

Deathifier, exemplified.

All of these stories should be part of the ingame lore. With statues, deeds, integrated plotlines and all.

AND 3d printed, physical statues! I mean, who doesn’t want a 12 ft Neverdie on their lawn!?

2 Likes

The only reason I’m still a player in this game is because of the quality efforts of the planet partners. Threatening to destroy them (and possibly my time, effort and items). Does not sit well, the lack of clarifying communication and complete radio silence from MA since this announcement is absurd, frustrating, and builds resentment for MA, for at least this player, and likely a large portion of the player base.

8 Likes

No they cant

1 Like

They don’t have a long term vision and plans for the game. Everytime something new is announced, you will get a half implementation and never hear from it again. They move to the next big thing, over and over again.

They haven’t finished anything in the last years, they let us be testers only to do nothing with the feedback we give them and move on to the next thing. Look at core components of the game as UI, but also the new website, how hard can it be to have the links correctly. And it’s not like they haven’t been notified on it, they don’t care.

2 Likes

I still think this is just a way to make it “lore” when lease expires and PPs decide to pull out.

However, it would be very nice to get some clarification on what compensation will be for items. If we know they will be compensated 1:1 with their current stats then people can happily continue trading and grinding for them. I find the whole announcement unnecessary. Really only reason would be to move cycle to Calypso but I don’t want to put on the tinfoil hat today.

1 Like

An interesting fact about this constellation is that one of the planet partners who have not immediately signalled compliance is the only one with a company backing many times bigger than MA. They could just turn around and swallow them whole, if they wanted to. Note, nobody has ever said anything to that tune, it’s only a theoretical possibility. Ever since we haven’t heard a single word from that side either, all inquiries get turned down. Until this changes, I can’t really find a good reason to spend anything, anywhere in this “universe”.

3 Likes

A clarification on this is certainly needed. I do not want to invest time and money on a planet which might not exist in a couple of years - destroying any planet specific items i have earned. What will happen to the dropship from Arkadia? Or the Atlas armour from NI? Do i get the TT value back? I’m not interested in that.

I’m sure I’m not the only one.

4 Likes

I realize MA doesn’t want to address this and many other things.

They would rather cowardly shove their heads in the sand and pretend it did not happen.

Here’s an idea then: If you don’t want to field questions on such topics, DON’T POST THEM!!!

I don’t remember anybody on this forum asking for something like Genesis probes…you brought this on yourself…again…

4 Likes

history will always repeat itself…

https://www.planetcalypsoforum.com/forum/index.php?threads/q-a-answers-may-07.61998/post-4053418

2 Likes

my humble opinion is that Genesis was a bullshit idea and will be discarded in an official post within 2026
as Messi said, it is just like Compet and Gardening… and CryptoEGG … a bad idea abandoned in some stage.

4 Likes