Smilgs hunting log - 2016 and beyond

This question coming from you seems stupid, but every question is a good one, I’ll say that I’m 99% sure only TT matters.

I think Dan is most skilled avatar but i can be wrong.

I Love to watch your log, it gives me hope :slight_smile:

good a hof happened on the last day of the month :smiley:
May 2016 = [COLOR=“#008000”]+1,035 hunting (99.86% tt)

wow only +1k for the month and that’s with 99.86% tt return, that just shows there is no markup (unless really lucky) in game right now.

Well he said he only adds markup to the stats “when stuff sells”, so we don’t know if markup is in this equation or not.

1 Like

June 2016 = [COLOR=“#008000”]+6,319 hunting (100.83% tt)

1 Like

Grats for yet another great month! :slight_smile:

This is the worst migration I remember so far. There are only 2 good things to be said from my perspective

  1. had some MU to add from last year’s ELM guns otherwise it would be +1505 peds which would be miserable
  2. the ELM guns this year do not drop as unbalanced as last year, and at least the blood samples aren’t rare loot messages
    as for the bad, very little 10k+ hofs (got none same as last year), eo stalkers loot when solo is just wrong, those blood samples are still a joke and no items like mod shadow and angel or other exclusives is stupid since honestly, there is no more concern for screwing MU on them, its all freefall anyway

July 2016 = [COLOR=“#008000”]+29,705 hunting (97.44% tt)

Have you been riding elm markup from last year every month since then or has this month been the anomoly?

And yea, it was apparent I needed to skip migration.

You complain at +30k in a month? :smiley:

Youve lost it!!!

Uber problems. And his gain was from last year guns.

Still +1505.. I’d take it!

keep it up.
Gratz

Saying goes: “One mans ceiling is another mans floor” Its all relative to what you are used to I guess.

I think that 99.9% of the population in EU would have been ecstatic with those results. Grats Smilgs on another successful month :slight_smile:

This is extremely bad reading skills or writing skills you pick :slight_smile: it was really +1505 rest is MU from last year’s migration

Not at all surprised by the migration dip. The loot has be particularly shitty this year.. both in terms of items and TT returns.

Even the streams are boring. nothing like watching someone grind stalkers and seeing 1-5k hofs of pure shrapnel.

But… a flood of ELM guns again would be horrible for the economy. Some nice angel/shadow parts and some higher lvl ul sib weapons would have been a good idea.

Watching someone loot a foeripper from eomon would have gotten people all excited.

I would have been happy with an A204 amp.

Resource caps and mindark’s inability to manage those caps are a bitch.

two things are official,

  1. return wise this was the worst migration since 2011, not sure if done intentionally (ended rather abruptly) but imho the superbad returns were caused by messing with the eomon LVLs and/or regen settings
  2. my months of good profit seen in 2014 and 2015 are over, guess it was over optimistic to think I could keep on top of the foodchain. as for the reasons, pick your poison (pretty sure I’m still on the top skill wise)
    a) my dpp cannot compete with the hordes of (L) armor users never getting hit, and the easter ring buyers
    b) got dropped from the golden avatars list
    c) withdrawals screwed it up
    in any case, my current balance cannot support the ~ 10000 peds spent in hunter salaries. the only reason I can stick around is that the LA income somewhat evens it out for now

so, just like before, I will stupidly hope for a big hof… until I run out of peds to turn over

August 2016 = [COLOR=“#008000”]+1,420 hunting (95.75% tt)

1 Like

So you are “running out of peds” but made 1420 ped? Have you been including LA income all along or are these gun sales from last year still?

Hunting balance wise it’s a plus, I’m “running out of peds” because shooters salaries are around 10k peds per month. LA income is not included in the log, but even that does not fully cover it.